Clarity & message quality
Purpose, main point, directness, reader understanding, complete information, actionable language, and avoiding ambiguity.
Written communication skill assessment
Assess clarity, grammar, sentence structure, tone, organisation, conciseness, audience awareness, professional email and report writing, editing, proofreading, and workplace communication.
Skill signals
Measure how candidates organise ideas, adapt tone, write clearly, and produce accurate workplace communication.
Purpose, main point, directness, reader understanding, complete information, actionable language, and avoiding ambiguity.
Grammar, tense, subject-verb agreement, punctuation, sentence construction, syntax, spelling, and mechanical accuracy.
Openings, paragraph structure, sequencing, transitions, supporting details, conclusions, and coherent message progression.
Professional tone, empathy, confidence, diplomacy, formality, sensitivity, and matching tone to the situation.
Brevity, focus, precise vocabulary, removing repetition, simplifying complex ideas, and avoiding unnecessary jargon.
Reader needs, context, level of detail, stakeholder expectations, cultural sensitivity, calls to action, and response framing.
Error detection, rewriting weak sentences, consistency, formatting, fact checks, proofreading discipline, and final-quality control.
Professional emails, reports, summaries, customer responses, internal updates, escalation notes, and practical judgement.
Assessment flow
Run a consistent assessment with realistic writing tasks, structured scoring, and decision-ready reports.
Choose role level, task types, audience, word limits, scoring criteria, and test duration.
Brief issuedCandidates draft emails, rewrite unclear messages, summarise information, edit documents, and respond to workplace scenarios.
Draft submittedScore clarity, grammar, structure, tone, conciseness, audience awareness, editing quality, and judgement.
Quality scoredCompare competency breakdowns, response quality, writing samples, and evidence-based hiring recommendations.
Report approvedScore breakdown
Use cases
Evaluate written clarity, empathy, tone, grammar, and response quality for customer-facing roles.
Customer responseAssess candidates who write emails, reports, summaries, updates, proposals, documentation, and internal communication.
Business documentIdentify candidates and employees who can communicate ideas clearly, edit their work, and adapt writing to different audiences.
Capability sampleUse realistic writing tasks, structured evaluation, and explainable score reports to improve communication screening across roles.
Use structured tasks, automated evaluation, and clear reports to shortlist stronger engineering candidates faster.