Secure coding & defensive development
Input handling, output encoding, safe APIs, error handling, logging, cryptography use, data protection, and secure coding standards.
Application security skill assessment
Assess secure coding, OWASP Top 10, identity and access controls, input validation, web and API security, threat modelling, security testing, dependency risk, secrets, DevSecOps, remediation, and practical judgement.
Application security assessment · Skill signals
Measure how candidates prevent common application weaknesses, design effective controls, use security testing appropriately, and prioritise remediation using real risk.
Input handling, output encoding, safe APIs, error handling, logging, cryptography use, data protection, and secure coding standards.
Injection, broken access control, security misconfiguration, vulnerable components, authentication failures, SSRF, XSS, and risk identification.
Identity verification, MFA, password handling, tokens, cookies, session lifecycle, role checks, object-level access, and least privilege.
Request validation, CORS, CSRF, rate limiting, schema validation, API authentication, object access, error exposure, and abuse prevention.
Assets, entry points, trust boundaries, data flows, misuse cases, STRIDE-style thinking, attack paths, design controls, and risk trade-offs.
Static analysis, dynamic testing, manual review, scanner findings, false positives, test coverage, verification, and security-testing strategy.
Dependency scanning, vulnerable packages, SBOM concepts, build integrity, secret detection, key rotation, third-party risk, and secure pipelines.
Security gates, developer feedback, finding triage, severity, exploitability, fix prioritisation, retesting, exception handling, and practical judgement.
Assessment flow
Run a consistent assessment with realistic application-security scenarios, structured scoring, and decision-ready reports.
Choose application type, technology stack, experience level, security depth, assessment duration, and scenario difficulty.
Candidates review code, identify risks, analyse authentication and APIs, model threats, interpret findings, and recommend fixes.
Score vulnerability knowledge, secure-design thinking, testing judgement, remediation quality, risk prioritisation, and practical accuracy.
Compare competency breakdowns, scenario decisions, response quality, question analysis, and evidence-based recommendations.
Score breakdown
Use cases
Evaluate secure coding, threat modelling, security testing, supply-chain risk, remediation, and risk-based AppSec judgement.
Assess developers who need to build secure web applications and APIs, handle identity correctly, and avoid common vulnerabilities.
Identify gaps in OWASP knowledge, secure design, code review, security tooling, vulnerability triage, and remediation verification.
Use realistic AppSec scenarios, automated evaluation, and explainable score reports to improve application-security, DevSecOps, engineering, and security-testing hiring.
Use structured tasks, automated evaluation, and clear reports to shortlist stronger engineering candidates faster.